2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 11 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from In Re RD.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | In Re RD Anchor | green | “t is an appellant's duty to present arguments that are sufficiently developed for our review. the brief must support the claims with pertinent discussion, with references to the record and with citations to legal authorities.” | 6 |
| 2 | Coulter v. Ramsden | green | “we need not reach the merits of this issue because the argument section of ppellant's brief merely consists of general statements unsupported by any discussion and analysis of relevant legal authority.” | 5 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.