5 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 98 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Nichols v. Michigan City Plant Planning Department.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Nichols v. Michigan City Plant Planning Department Anchor | green | “the non-moving party waives any arguments that were not raised in its response to the moving party's motion for summary judgment.” | 67 |
| 2 | Gerhard Witte v. Wisconsin Department of Corrections | green | “by failing to raise in his brief opposing summary judgment, lost the opportunity to urge it in both the district court and this court.” | 12 |
| 3 | Keck Garrett & Associates, Inc. v. Nextel Communications, Inc. | green | “nextel specifically requested summary judgment on the quantum meruit claim. keck garrett, however, did not defend that claim in its reply to nextel's motion for summary judgment. by failing to present its argument to the district court, keck garrett abandoned its claim.” | 10 |
| 4 | Salas v. Wisconsin Department of Corrections | green | “party forfeits any argument it fails to raise in a brief opposing summary judgment.” | 6 |
| 5 | Byrd-Tolson v. Supervalu, Inc. | green | “since plaintiff has not provided any evidence that any store employees were aware of the substance she slipped on, she has not demonstrated actual notice.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.