3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 10 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from U.S. Philips Corp. v. KBC Bank N.V..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | U.S. Philips Corp. v. KBC Bank N.V. Anchor | green | “a preliminary injunction imposed according to the procedures outlined in federal rule of civil procedure 65 dissolves ipso facto when a final judgment is entered in the cause.” | 4 |
| 2 | Beauharnais v. Illinois | green | “there are certain well-defined and narrowly limited classes of speech, the prevention and punishment of which have never been thought to raise any constitutional problem. these include the lewd and obscene, the profane, the libelous, and the insulting or 'fighting' words . . . .” | 3 |
| 3 | Thompson v. Freeman | green | “nonparty may be enjoined under rule 65(d) only when its interests closely 'identify with' those of the defendant, when the nonparty and defendant stand in 'privity,' or when the defendant 'represents' or 'controls' the nonparty.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.