Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 116 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Davis v. Lafler.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Davis v. Lafler Anchor | green | “a nearly insurmountable hurdle” | 59 |
| 2 | Tucker v. Palmer | green | “the law commands deference at two levels in this case: first, deference should be given to the trier-of-fact's verdict, as contemplated by jackson; second, deference should be given to the michigan court of appeals' consideration of the trier-of-fact's verdict, as dictated by ae…” | 57 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.