2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 10 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Santiago v. Warminster Township.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Santiago v. Warminster Township Anchor | green | “e disregard legal conclusions and 'recitals of the elements of a cause of action, supported by mere conclusory statements.” | 5 |
| 2 | Hbe Leasing Corporation v. Frank | green | “this approach finds its most frequent application to lenders who have financed leveraged buyouts of companies that subsequently become insolvent.” | 5 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.