3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 10 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from United States v. Edward Terry.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | United States v. Edward Terry Anchor | green | “no effort is made in the indictment even to suggest that the offenses are . . . parts of a common scheme.” | 4 |
| 2 | United States v. Randazzo | green | “congress did not provide for joinder for unrelated transactions . . . merely because some evidence might be common to all of the counts.” | 3 |
| 3 | United States v. Edward Terry | green | “count i and ii describe an event occurring on june 9, 1988 in san joaquin county. count iii describes an event occurring on june 22, 1988 in another city and county. the drug crimes referred to in counts i and ii are wholly different from the possession of a firearm charge in co…” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.