3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 10 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Florasynth, Inc. v. Alfred Pickholz.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Florasynth, Inc. v. Alfred Pickholz Anchor | green | “the confirmation of an arbitration award is a summary proceeding that merely makes what is already a final arbitration award a judgment of the court” | 4 |
| 2 | Ottley v. Schwartzberg | green | “the showing required to avoid summary confirmation is high” | 3 |
| 3 | Burlington Northern Railroad v. TUCO Inc. | green | “judicial scrutiny focuses on integrity of process rather than propriety of result” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.