3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 10 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Doucet v. Dental Health Plans Mgmt. Corp..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Doucet v. Dental Health Plans Mgmt. Corp. Anchor | green | “classification of the contract at issue as an insurance contract renders the arbitration provisions of that contract unenforceable under r.s. 22:629.” | 4 |
| 2 | Morgan v. Sundance, Inc. | green | “nine circuits, including the eighth, have invoked "the strong federal policy favoring arbitration" in support of an arbitration-specific waiver rule demanding a showing of prejudice. two circuits have rejected that rule. we do too.” | 3 |
| 3 | Hobbs v. IGF Insurance Co. | green | “louisiana courts have consistently held that compulsory arbitration clauses in contracts of insurance are unenforceable under this statute because they operate to deprive louisiana courts of jurisdiction of the action against the insurer.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.