3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 10 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Prystash v. State.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Prystash v. State Anchor | green | “the doctrine of invited error is properly thought of, not as a species of waiver, but as estoppel.” | 4 |
| 2 | Ex Parte Drake | green | “because of the unique nature of the remedy, habeas corpus relief is underscored by elements of fairness and equity.” | 3 |
| 3 | Ex Parte Carrio | green | “we agree with the state that the doctrine of laches is a theory which we may, and should, employ in our determination of whether to grant relief in any given 11.07 case.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.