2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 10 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Norskog v. Pfiel.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Norskog v. Pfiel Anchor | green | “if the facts are uncontroverted and the issue is the trial court's application of the law to the facts, a court of review may determine the correctness of the ruling independently of the trial court's judgment.” | 7 |
| 2 | Chicago's Pizza, Inc. v. Chicago's Pizza Franchise Limited USA | green | “the standard of review in a bench trial is whether the judgment is against the manifest weight of the evidence.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.