3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 10 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Price v. Philip Morris, Inc..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Price v. Philip Morris, Inc. Anchor | green | “statutory construction is a question of law, subject to de novo review.” | 4 |
| 2 | Ferguson v. McKenzie | green | “where there is an alleged conflict between two statutes, a court has a duty to interpret those statutes in a manner that avoids an inconsistency and gives effect to both statutes, where such an interpretation is reasonably possible.” | 3 |
| 3 | Sheffler v. Commonwealth Edison Co. | green | “statutory construction is a question of law, subject to de novo review.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.