8 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 93 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from People v. Ward.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | People v. Ward Anchor | green | “point raised in a brief but not supported by citation to relevant authority is therefore forfeited” | 26 |
| 2 | In Re Marriage of Bates | green | “a reviewing court is entitled to have issues clearly defined with relevant authority cited.” | 24 |
| 3 | People v. Easley | green | “the remarks by the prosecutor, while improper, do not amount to substantial prejudice” | 10 |
| 4 | People v. Robinson | green | “e leave the resolution of this issue to another day, as our conclusion would be the same applying either standard.” | 4 |
| 5 | People v. Robinson | green | “in any event, like the johnson court, we leave the resolution of this issue to another day, as our conclusion would be the same applying either standard.” | 3 |
| 6 | In Re Marriage of Bates | green | “reviewing court is entitled to have issues clearly defined with relevant authority cited” | 2 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.