2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 10 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from William B. Shipley v. Chicago Board of Elections.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | William B. Shipley v. Chicago Board of Elections Anchor | green | “arguments that are underdevel- oped, cursory, and lack supporting authority are waived.” | 5 |
| 2 | Tawuo v. Lynch | green | “when caught in what appeared to be a lie, provided an unconvincing explanation. the was well within his rights to regard this as evidence of a lack of credibility.” | 5 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.