2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 10 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from In re K.J.H..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | In re K.J.H. Anchor | green | “child, due to his minority and lack of representation in the orphans' court, could not raise this issue himself.” | 6 |
| 2 | Adoption of K.M.G., Appeal of: T.L.G. | green | “not only do children not have a say in the appointment of counsel, due to their minority, most children are not in a position to assess whether counsel has represented their interests effectively.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.