3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 9 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from United States v. Wilson.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | United States v. Wilson Anchor | green | “a court may consider any information (including hearsay), regardless of its admissibility at trial, in determining whether factors exist that would enhance a defendant's sentence, provided that the information is sufficiently reliable.” | 3 |
| 2 | United States v. Dewey M. Hamaker | green | “the district court's factual findings for purposes of sentencing may be based on, among other things, evidence heard during trial, undisputed statements in the , or evidence presented during the sentencing hearing.” | 3 |
| 3 | United States v. Foley | green | “he guidelines require a district court to take into account not merely the charged conduct, but rather all relevant conduct, in calculating a defendant's offense level.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.