3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 9 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from United States v. Richard Kevin Post.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | United States v. Richard Kevin Post Anchor | green | “it is not unreasonable to suspect a dealer in narcotics might be armed” | 3 |
| 2 | Carmouche v. State | green | “he additional intrusion that accompanies a terry frisk is only justified where the officer can point to specific and articulable facts which reasonably lead him to conclude that the suspect might possess a weapon” | 3 |
| 3 | Wade, Christopher James | green | “if an officer is justified in believing that a person whose suspicious behavior he is investigating is armed, he may 7 frisk that person to determine if the suspect is, in fact, carrying a weapon and, if so, to neutralize the threat of physical harm.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.