3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 9 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from United States v. Ricardo R. Esle, Roberto Diaz Gomez, A/K/A Robert Redruello, and Luis G. Arango.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | United States v. Ricardo R. Esle, Roberto Diaz Gomez, A/K/A Robert Redruello, and Luis G. Arango Anchor | green | “where . . . the basis of the expert's opinion has been thoroughly impeached, the court, as fact finder, is thus plainly authorized to reject the opinion entirely” | 3 |
| 2 | Howard v. Indiana | green | “where . . . the basis of the expert's opinion has been thoroughly impeached, the court, as fact finder, is thus plainly authorized to reject the opinion entirely” | 3 |
| 3 | Jones v. Louisiana | green | “where . . . the basis of the expert's opinion has been thoroughly impeached, the court, as fact finder, is thus plainly authorized to reject the opinion entirely” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.