3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 9 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from United States v. George Ingram.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | United States v. George Ingram Anchor | green | “plea agreements, however, are 'unique con- tracts' and the ordinary contract principles are supplemented with a concern that the bargaining process not violate the de- fendant's right to fundamental fairness under the due process clause.” | 3 |
| 2 | Beckles v. United States | green | “in johnson, we applied the vagueness rule to a statute fixing permissible sentences. the acca's residual clause ... fixed-in an impermissibly vague way-a higher range of sentences for certain defendants.” | 3 |
| 3 | Sessions v. Dimaya | green | “try- ing to reconcile them with each other, and then compare them to whatever unlisted crime was at issue, drove many a judge a little batty.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.