3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 9 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Meyer v. Rigdon.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Meyer v. Rigdon Anchor | green | “default judgment is nor- mally not given preclusive effect under the collateral estoppel doctrine because no issue has been 'actually litigated.” | 3 |
| 2 | In re Marriage of Arjmand | green | “he plain language of rule 304(b)(4) is unambiguous: it permits interlocutory appeals only from final judgments entered in ci- tation proceedings under section 2-1402 of the code.” | 3 |
| 3 | Steven Lauth v. Covance, Inc. | green | “e can in- voke waiver sua sponte . . . .” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.