4 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 89 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Josephine L. Cage v. Commissioner of Social Security.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Josephine L. Cage v. Commissioner of Social Security Anchor | green | “in our review, we defer to the commissioner's resolution of conflicting evidence.” | 37 |
| 2 | Rita Schaal v. Kenneth S. Apfel, Commissioner of Social Security, 1 Dockets 96-6212, 96-6316 | green | “it is for the ssa, and not this court, to weigh the conflicting evidence in the record” | 25 |
| 3 | Josephine L. Cage v. Commissioner of Social Security | green | “in our view, we defer to the commissioner's resolution of conflicting evidence.” | 8 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.