3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 9 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Brendan McKown v. Simon Property Group Inc.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Brendan McKown v. Simon Property Group Inc Anchor | green | “it is the scope of that duty that is dispositive.” | 3 |
| 2 | Nivens v. Corner | green | “what we have impliedly recognized in earlier cases, we now explicitly hold: a special relationship exists between a business and an invitee.” | 3 |
| 3 | Tae Kim v. Budget Rent A Car Systems, Inc. | green | “this court has rejected utilization of high crime rates as a basis for imposing a tort duty” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.