3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 9 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Utsch v. Utsch.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Utsch v. Utsch Anchor | green | “the burden of proof that the transfer was a gift is upon the party seeking to establish the gift.” | 3 |
| 2 | Cirrito v. Cirrito | green | “the burden of proof that the transfer was a gift is upon the party seeking to establish the gift by clear and convincing evidence.” | 3 |
| 3 | Mary Anne Rowe v. Charles S. Rowe | green | “the fact that property is jointly titled must be considered by the trial court in determining if a gift was made, but alone, it is insufficient proof of a gift.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.