3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 9 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from In Re CLT.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | In Re CLT Anchor | green | “failure to object to alleged error at the trial level may preclude raising the point on appeal.” | 3 |
| 2 | Sherry R. v. State, Department of Health & Social Services, Division of Family & Youth Services | green | “the superior court is entitled to rely on a parent's documented history of conduct as a predictor of future behavior.” | 3 |
| 3 | Erica A. v. State, Department of Health & Social Services, Division of Family & Youth Services | green | “we have held that the state's efforts to prevent breakup of the entire family may be considered in assessing whether that effort was sufficient with respect to a particular child.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.