3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 9 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Greco v. Parsons.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Greco v. Parsons Anchor | green | “greco's failure to comply with an ordinance, because it was impossible to comply, amounts to a legally cognizable justification for his failure. such justification defeats the legal sufficiency of the recall petition.” | 3 |
| 2 | In Re Recall of Sandhaus | green | “wjilfullness can probably be found in evidence showing that sandhaus knew he was overspending and did so even after the board and the auditor warned him against doing so.” | 3 |
| 3 | In re the Recall of Sandhaus | green | “wjilfullness can probably be found in evidence showing that sandhaus knew he was overspending and did so even after the board and the auditor warned him against doing so.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.