3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 9 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Shelden v. State.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Shelden v. State Anchor | green | “he state is to demonstrate, by evidence other than the defendant's admission, that the crime was in fact committed.” | 3 |
| 2 | KAK v. State | green | “a defendant's mere proximity to the illegal items is insufficient to sustain a conviction.” | 3 |
| 3 | J.B. v. State | green | “the trial court's admission of a confession over a corpus delicti objection is reviewed for an abuse of discretion.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.