7 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 87 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Rice v. Collins.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Rice v. Collins Anchor | green | “state-court factual findings, moreover, are presumed correct; the petitioner has the burden of rebutting the presumption by 'clear and convincing evidence.” | 26 |
| 2 | Yarborough v. Alvarado | green | “we look for 'the governing legal principle or principles set forth by the supreme court at the time the state court renders its decision.” | 19 |
| 3 | Price, Warden v. Vincent | green | “it is the habeas applicant's burden to show that the state court applied that case to the facts of his case in an objectively unreasonable manner” | 14 |
| 4 | Miller-El v. Cockrell | green | “even in the context of federal habeas, deference does not imply abandonment or abdication of judicial review. deference does not by definition preclude relief.” | 13 |
| 5 | Miller-El v. Dretke | green | “e presume the texas court's factual findings to be sound unless miller-el rebuts the 'presumption of correctness by clear and convincing evidence.” | 8 |
| 6 | Miller-El v. Dretke | green | “we presume the texas court's factual findings to be sound unless miller-el rebuts the 'presumption of correctness by clear and convincing evidence.” | 5 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.