3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 9 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Glidepath Holding B v. v. Spherion Corp..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Glidepath Holding B v. v. Spherion Corp. Anchor | green | “hether a plaintiff has adequately pleaded justifiable reliance can be a proper subject for a motion to dismiss in certain circumstances.” | 3 |
| 2 | Voss v. Black & Decker Manufacturing Co. | green | “the plaintiff, of course, is under an obligation to present evidence that the product, as designed, was not reasonably safe because there was a substantial likelihood of harm and it was feasible to design the product in a safer manner.” | 3 |
| 3 | Estrada v. Berkel Inc. | green | “where liability is predicated on a failure to warn, new york views negligence and strict liability claims as equivalent” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.