Topic: a motion to alter or amend judgment pursuant to rule 59(e) … · Go Syfert
← All topics

Topic #3132

3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 9 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Consolidated Service Corp. v. Robinson.

#Case FlagCanonical passage Citers
1 Consolidated Service Corp. v. Robinson Anchor
scotus · 1983
green “a motion to alter or amend judgment pursuant to rule 59(e) may not be granted where to do so would undermine the jury's fact-finding role and trample on the defendant's seventh amendment right to a jury trial.” 3
2 Save The Valley, Inc. v. Environmental Protection Agency
scotus · 1983
green “a motion to alter or amend judgment pursuant to rule 59(e) may not be granted where to do so would undermine the jury's fact-finding role and trample on the defendant's seventh amendment right to a jury trial.” 3
3 Computer Sciences Corp. v. United States
scotus · 1983
green “a motion to alter or amend judgment pursuant to rule 59(e) may not be granted where to do so would undermine the jury's fact-finding role and trample on the defendant's seventh amendment right to a jury trial.” 3

A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.

← Caselaw search · Hot / Trending / Newly red · Brief Check