3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 9 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Keystone Coca-Cola Bottling Co. v. Pennsylvania Unemployment Compensation Board of Review.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Keystone Coca-Cola Bottling Co. v. Pennsylvania Unemployment Compensation Board of Review Anchor | green | “when parties include such a broad arbitration clause, they intend the clause to reach all aspects of the relationship” | 3 |
| 2 | Rodriguez v. United States Postal Service | green | “when parties include such a broad arbitration clause, they intend the clause to reach all aspects of the relationship” | 3 |
| 3 | Smith v. Hunton | green | “when parties include such a broad arbitration clause, they intend the clause to reach all aspects of the relationship” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.