2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 8 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from United States v. Jose Gerardo Munoz-Fabela.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | United States v. Jose Gerardo Munoz-Fabela Anchor | green | “t is only the fact of the offense, and not a conviction, that is needed to establish the required predicate.” | 5 |
| 2 | United States v. Cecil Ray Frye, Jr. | green | “ection 924 does not require that a defendant be convicted of, or even charged with, the predicate offense” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.