2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 8 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Skinner v. Switzer.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Skinner v. Switzer Anchor | green | “complaint need not pin plaintiff's claim for relief to a precise legal theory.” | 5 |
| 2 | Loofbourrow v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue Service | green | “he court may not look beyond the four corners of the plaintiff's pleadings.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.