2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 8 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Carnation Company v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Carnation Company v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue Anchor | green | “elated documents must be considered together.” | 4 |
| 2 | Ringle v. Bruton | green | “arol evidence is admissible to . . . clarify ambiguous terms so long as the evidence does not contradict the terms of the written agreement.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.