2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 8 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Nipper v. Smith.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Nipper v. Smith Anchor | green | “n item of circumstantial evidence is irrelevant only if it does not allow the trier of fact reasonably to infer anything about whether or not the voting strength of the minority group has been impermissibly diluted.” | 4 |
| 2 | Solomon v. Liberty County, Fla. | green | “plaintiffs correctly conceded that there was no racial motivation behind the 1900 amendment to the florida constitution of 1885, which provided for at-large election of county commissioners.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.