4 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 82 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from In Re WINSHIP.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | In Re WINSHIP Anchor | green | “he due process clause protects the accused against conviction except upon proof beyond a reasonable doubt of every fact necessary to constitute the crime with which he is charged.” | 44 |
| 2 | In Re WINSHIP | green | “e explicitly hold that the due process clause protects the accused against conviction except upon proof beyond a reasonable doubt of every fact necessary to constitute the crime with which he is charged.” | 26 |
| 3 | In Re WINSHIP | green | “the due process clause protects the accused against conviction except upon proof beyond a reasonable doubt of every fact necessary to constitute the crime with which he is charged” | 9 |
| 4 | People v. Allen | green | “circumstantial evidence and reasonable inferences arising from that evidence can constitute satisfactory proof of the elements of a crime.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.