2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 8 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from United States v. Peter N. Fernandez, Iii, Peter N. Fernandez, Jr., and Kenneth K. Getty.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | United States v. Peter N. Fernandez, Iii, Peter N. Fernandez, Jr., and Kenneth K. Getty Anchor | green | “overnment not have to prove a contemplated harm to a victim.” | 4 |
| 2 | United States v. Larry Harvey | green | “generally speaking, 'tardily challenged indictments should be construed liberally in favor of validity.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.