2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 8 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from United States v. Darwin Jay Copeland Anthony Antoine Hartwell.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | United States v. Darwin Jay Copeland Anthony Antoine Hartwell Anchor | green | “this court reviews a constitutional challenge to a defendant's sentence de novo wherever the defendant preserves the claim for appellate review.” | 4 |
| 2 | United States v. Rachel Shannon Sosebee (03-1923) and Jack P. Farris (03-2219) | green | “in addition, five of our sister circuits have recently addressed the issue of whether booker affects restitution orders. although they rely on different reasoning, all five circuits have uniformly declined to reverse an order of restitution based on the concerns raised in blakel…” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.