2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 8 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from California Public Employees' Retirement System v. The Chubb Corporation.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | California Public Employees' Retirement System v. The Chubb Corporation Anchor | green | “the lack of any predicate violation of the securities exchange act of 1934 compels dismissal of control person claims.” | 4 |
| 2 | Leonard Panella v. Tesco Corporation | green | “even for omission-based claims, the plaintiff must identify specific 'statements ' that are rendered 'false or misleading' by the alleged omissions.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.