2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 8 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Wardleigh v. 2ND JUD. DIST. CT. OF STATE.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Wardleigh v. 2ND JUD. DIST. CT. OF STATE Anchor | green | “if improper discovery were allowed, the assertedly privileged information would irretrievably lose its confidential and privileged quality and petitioners would have no effective remedy, even by a later appeal.” | 4 |
| 2 | Wardleigh v. Second Judicial District Court of the State of Nevada ex rel. County of Washoe | green | “if improper discovery were allowed, the assertedly privileged information would irretrievably lose its confidential and privileged quality and petitioners would have no effective remedy, even by a later appeal.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.