9 canonical passages across 8 cases, quoted by 79 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Bast v. Cohen, Dunn & Sinclair, Pc.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Bast v. Cohen, Dunn & Sinclair, Pc Anchor | green | “llegation of personal injury and pecuniary losses occurring therefrom are not sufficient to meet the statutory requirement of injury to 'business or property.” | 17 |
| 2 | Meyer v. Holley | green | “raditional vicarious liability rules ordinarily make principals or employers vicariously liable for acts of their agents or employees in the scope of their authority or employment.” | 15 |
| 3 | De Falco v. Bernas | green | “the requirements of section 1962(c) must be established as to each individual defendant.” | 15 |
| 4 | Rosemond v. United States | green | “person is liable under 2 for aiding and abetting a crime if (and only if) he (1) takes an affirmative act in furtherance of that offense, (2) with the intent of facilitating the offense's commission.” | 10 |
| 5 | State Ex Rel. Wilson v. Ortho-McNeil-Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc. | green | “n an enforcement action brought by the attorney general, there is no actual impact requirement.” | 6 |
| 6 | Ascente Business Consulting v. DR myCommerce | green | “it is not sufficient to attribute alleged false statements to 'defendants' generally.” | 6 |
| 7 | Meyer v. Holley | green | “it is well established that traditional vicarious liability rules ordinarily make principals or employers vicariously liable for acts of their agents or employees in the scope of their authority or employment.” | 4 |
| 8 | Bob Hammond Construction Co. v. Banks Construction Co. | green | “f a contract is made for the benefit of a third person, that person may enforce the contract if the contracting parties intended to create a direct, rather than an incidental or consequential, benefit to such third person.” | 3 |
| 9 | Taylor v. Bettis | green | “if . . . the court dismisses federal claim providing personal jurisdiction - also known as the 'anchor' federal claim - early in the litigation, the court may, in its discretion, dismiss the remaining federal and state claims.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.