2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 8 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from In re: Felix M. Palacios.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | In re: Felix M. Palacios Anchor | green | “was not made 23 retroactive . . . .” | 4 |
| 2 | Lepon v. Iowa | green | “was not made 23 retroactive . . . .” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.