2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 8 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Sturtz v. New York World's Fair 1964-1965 Corp..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Sturtz v. New York World's Fair 1964-1965 Corp. Anchor | green | “a serious and studied disregard for the orderly processes of justice"; "intentional ... acts of misconduct ... involving serious breaches of the canons of ethics” | 4 |
| 2 | Kwai Chiu Yuen v. Immigration & Naturalization Service | green | “a serious and studied disregard for the orderly processes of justice"; "intentional ... acts of misconduct ... involving serious breaches of the canons of ethics” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.