2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 8 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from M. S. ex rel. S.S. v. Board of Education.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | M. S. ex rel. S.S. v. Board of Education Anchor | green | “the fact that both the parties have moved for summary judgment does not mean that the court must grant summary judgment to one party or the other.” | 4 |
| 2 | Cayetano v. Chevron U.S.A. Inc. | green | “the fact that both the parties have moved for summary judgment does not mean that the court must grant summary judgment to one party or the other.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.