2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 7 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Mary Elizabeth Leary and Glenda H. Williams v. Stephen Daeschner.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Mary Elizabeth Leary and Glenda H. Williams v. Stephen Daeschner Anchor | green | “but a court choosing to modify the schedule upon a showing of good cause, may do so only 'if it cannot reasonably be met despite the diligence of the party seeking the extension.” | 4 |
| 2 | United States ex rel. Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. v. Nelson, Inc. | green | “because the court finds no good cause to amend the scheduling order under rule 16(b), it will not address whether leave to amend is appropriate under rule 15(a).” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.