2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 7 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Virginia Uranium, Inc. v. Warren.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Virginia Uranium, Inc. v. Warren Anchor | green | “t is our duty to respect not only what congress wrote but, as importantly, what it didn't write.” | 4 |
| 2 | Renstrom v. Astrue | green | “the alj is not required to discuss methodically each polaski consideration, so long as he acknowledged and examined those considerations before discounting a claimant's subjective complaints” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.