5 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 75 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from George Linardos v. Edmund Fortuna, Joan Fortuna and Susan Joan Linardos.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | George Linardos v. Edmund Fortuna, Joan Fortuna and Susan Joan Linardos Anchor | green | “for purposes of diversity jurisdiction, a party's citizenship depends on his domicile.” | 36 |
| 2 | Marian R. Canedy v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company | green | “llegations of residency alone cannot establish citizenship . . . .” | 19 |
| 3 | Marian R. Canedy v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company | green | “t is well-established that allegations of residency alone cannot establish citizenship . . . .” | 9 |
| 4 | Marian R. Canedy v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company | green | “allegations of residency alone cannot establish citizenship . . . .” | 7 |
| 5 | Diaz v. Judge Advocate General of the Navy | green | “here a court lacks subject matter jurisdiction, it also lacks the power to dismiss with prejudice.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.