10 canonical passages across 10 cases, quoted by 74 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from McCoy v. Astrue.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | McCoy v. Astrue Anchor | green | “a claimant's represents the most he can do despite the combined effects of all of his credible limitations and must be based on all credible evidence.” | 25 |
| 2 | Deborah Swarthout v. Kilolo Kijakazi | green | “while daily activities alone do not disprove disability, they are a factor to consider in evaluating subjective complaints of pain.” | 9 |
| 3 | Charles Bryant v. Nancy A. Berryhill | green | “part of the determination includes an assessment of the claimant's credibility regarding subjective complaints.” | 8 |
| 4 | Boettcher v. Astrue | green | “substantial evidence means less than a preponderance but enough that a reasonable person would find it adequate to support the decision.” | 7 |
| 5 | Karl Wright v. Carolyn W. Colvin | green | “wright himself admits to engaging in daily activities that this court has previously found inconsistent with disabling pain, such as driving, shopping, bathing, and cooking.” | 7 |
| 6 | Curtis Igo v. Carolyn Colvin | green | “we may not reverse simply because we would have reached a different conclusion than the alj or because substantial evidence supports a contrary conclusion.” | 5 |
| 7 | Veronica Grindley v. Kilolo Kijakazi | green | “we normally defer to an alj's credibility determination.” | 4 |
| 8 | Kirby v. Astrue | green | “step two of the evaluation states that a claimant is not disabled if his impairments are not 'severe.” | 3 |
| 9 | Wagner v. Astrue | green | “wagner engaged in extensive daily activities, such as fixing meals, doing housework, shopping for groceries, and visiting friends.” | 3 |
| 10 | Lacey Reece v. Carolyn Colvin | green | “evidence of daily activities that are inconsistent with allegations of disabling pain may be considered in judging the credibility of such complaints.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.