6 canonical passages across 6 cases, quoted by 71 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Cont'l 332 Fund, LLC v. Albertelli.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Cont'l 332 Fund, LLC v. Albertelli Anchor | green | “he eleventh circuit applies federal rico analysis equally to florida rico claims.” | 25 |
| 2 | O'MALLEY v. St. Thomas University, Inc. | green | “ndirect injuries, that is, injuries sustained not as a direct result of predicate acts . . . will not allow recovery under florida rico.” | 18 |
| 3 | Emmons v. Baptist Hosp. | green | “a prerequisite to the imposition upon the landowner of a duty to warn is that the defendant's knowledge of the danger must be superior to that of the business invitee.” | 10 |
| 4 | Dampier v. MORGAN TIRE & AUTO, LLC | green | “the open and obvious nature of a hazard may discharge a landowner's duty to warn, but it does not discharge the landowner's duty to maintain the property in a reasonably safe condition.” | 9 |
| 5 | Euro RSCG Direct Response, LLC v. Green Bullion Financial Services | green | “motion is intended to provide a remedy for an unintelligible pleading, rather than a vehicle for obtaining greater detail.” | 6 |
| 6 | Cramer v. State of Florida | green | “cramer and kessler's complaint is a rambling 'shotgun' pleading that is so disorganized and ambiguous that it is almost impossible to discern precisely what it is that these appellants are claiming.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.