2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 6 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Supermarket Equipment Corp..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Supermarket Equipment Corp. Anchor | green | “here a nontestifying co-defendant's confession incriminating the defendant is not directly admissible against the defendant ... the confrontation clause bars its admission at their joint trial....” | 3 |
| 2 | Cruz v. New York | green | “here a nontestifying co-defendant's confession incriminating the defendant is not directly admissible against the defendant ... the confrontation clause bars its admission at their joint trial....” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.