2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 6 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Travelers Casualty & Surety Co. v. Insurance Co. of North America.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Travelers Casualty & Surety Co. v. Insurance Co. of North America Anchor | green | “ost-judgment interest on travelers' award of prejudgment interest did not begin to run until the december 5, 2007 order was entered quantifying the amount in prejudgment interest owed to travelers.” | 3 |
| 2 | United States v. CITGO Asphalt Ref. Co. (In Re Frescati Shipping Co., Ltd.) | green | “ad the district court chosen to use the prime rate, it would not have abused its discretion even without extensive proof of borrowing costs.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.