2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 6 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Schrier v. University of Colorado.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Schrier v. University of Colorado Anchor | green | “as a preliminary injunction is an extraordinary remedy, the right to relief must be clear and unequivocal.” | 3 |
| 2 | Mazurek v. Armstrong | green | “as a preliminary injunction is an extraordinary remedy, the right to relief must be clear and unequivocal.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.