2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 6 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Herbert Rosenthal Jewelry Corp. v. Edward and Lucy Kalpakian, Etc..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Herbert Rosenthal Jewelry Corp. v. Edward and Lucy Kalpakian, Etc. Anchor | green | “we think the production of jeweled bee pins is a larger private preserve than congress intended to be set aside . . . . a jeweled bee pin is therefore an 'idea' that defen- dants were free to copy.” | 3 |
| 2 | Data East USA, Inc. v. Epyx, Inc. | green | “because of these constraints, karate is not sus- ceptible of a wholly fanciful presentation.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.